Saturday, October 30, 2010

Reads!

Microsoft buys Canesta. This development is important as gesture-based computing becomes increasingly significant. Kinect today, who knows, Windows 10 the next?

"Genes are nature - therefore unpatentable" - that's going to be a major ruling, especially for big biotech companies.

Arctic narwhals reveal fallacies in contemporary climate model. Doesn't sound that bad until one realises that climate projections of temperature increases of the Arctic are underestimated than actual occurrence. Very, very troubling.

Cyberwarfare - amidst the hype, what's real, and what's not?

Friday, October 29, 2010

lighthearted reads

I know that my fingers sometimes have a mind of their own during typing. So when this came out, I wasn't too surprised.

On a more serious note, rare earth metal access is definitely something to watch out for, given our electronics-hungry age.

Reads!

Is Robert Kaplan anticipating the rise of the next cold war between India and China?

Chinese Supercomputer is 1.4 times faster than the previous fastest supercomputer...

and the obvious implications...

US military investing in green fuels?

China resumes rare-earth export to countries... surely other countries will start to think about resource security...

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Reads!

The media, military, and wikileaks. Arguments of free press, media bias, and the collusion with the military are apparent here in this Salon article.

And for something lighter - the brain takes very little time to decide to fall in love. Wait, who's actually doing the deciding?

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Reads!

Not much else is happening, but here are still some relatively cool reads:

Bees can solve problems faster than supercomputers?

Taste receptors in the lungs?

and... Green economics policy post in the UK?

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Reads!

The two articles different in that they are completely different in spirit. One is outrageously optimistic, while the other is... downright pessimistic. Is a fork in the road impending? Or will one outcome be the consequence of other? Will we be building starships to save us from... ourselves?

Drought in the next few decades, forecasted:

Starships in the next 100 years?

Reads!

I didn't get the implications of this article the first time round. Now that I do, I'll love to keep track of this development. This is an anticipated 'quantum leap' technology.

Cool meets geek:

The combination of two of my teenage impulses: theoretical physics and superconductivity. 'Nuff said.

Reads!

Reads!

What motivates people to save energy other than climate concerns (or how to get 'conservative' Americans signing up for green energy).

Kevin Kelly and Steven Johnson have just gotten their latest books published; What Technology Wants and Where Ideas Come from. I hope to have them on my book shelf very soon.

New skills for the new world, and why any education should adopt some of them (really, no kidding. MOE should take note to implement some of these suggestions)

How to really help developing countries...

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

YC at Blink Bl_nk!

To those who were at TEDxNUS, and witnessed the various creative techniques of invertebrate copulation, it might be of interest to you that YC will be presenting at Blink Bl_nk (http://blinkbl-nk.com/) on Wednesday evening 7.30pm at Blu Jazz!

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Reads!

Reads!

reads!

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Reads!

Adaptation to climate change by communities...

Massive changes afoot in the solar energy industry. The US now looks like a laggard compared to the swiftness of the Chinese companies (assisted by their own government). If Chinese solar energy dominate the globe, the US will have only itself to blame for not being able to capitalise. Innovation and rapid scaling are the only cards that the US can play now.

Different approaches to gravity?

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Various links!

Keeping fit! A reminder for myself more than anything, actually!

I wonder what figures can be put into the Drake Equation...

First an open letter to the UK Treasury by science advocates to prevent cuts to science research...

Then the actual protesting by scientists outside the Treasury!

NYT's Smarter than You Think continues to be a treasure trove on developments in the field of Artificial Intelligence!

And... the colony-collapse disorder that precipitated a panic on agriculture... finally getting closer to a resolution. Just that bee research is certainly not the first place one thinks about when it comes to academia-military collaboration. Manhattan project, anyone?

Reflections from a funeral

Reflections from a funeral

My grandma passed away recently. She was 96. She was a matriarch of 5 generations, and it was significant enough that a Chinese evening tabloid covered it. I have no significant memories of my grandma; I attended the funeral as a matter of custom and tradition, and for my mum. But that was it. Along the way I realized the reality of such things as tradition and custom. While often deemed as irrational or 'backward', in the face of the mystery of death, these traditions and customs have a powerful effect on worldviews. In this sense, the funeral I participated in was not so much an emotional one, but a chance to participate in the worldviews of others, and along the way, to gain other insights. There are other findings and realizations, some more urgent than others. This was an all-Chinese funeral. I saw people born in the my parents generation, those born in the 50s and 60s. I begin to realise that traditions and customs are a powerful force in their right; in that educated PMETs would even willingly conform to such worldviews. Perhaps they lived in a different Singapore, where opportunities were structured much differently than they are today. These are the people for whom education was optional, where individual intuition mattered more. As we live today, the magnitude of these changes are difficult to comprehend, but it is the recognition of these chasms that require attending to for any would-be strategist intending to change any trajectories. The people in the 18-35 age group have to attend to that worldviews chasm as they (we) live in a Singapore that will be dominated demographically by the people born in the different setting a generation ago. I realise that the family played a far greater role than today; whereas today I inhabit a friend-based networks, my parents inhabit a world where economic relations and kinship ties frequently overlapped. I am distant from my kin-contemporaries in a way that my parents would have thought anathema regarding theirs. There is also another aspect to these observations, and this pertains to the cultural aspect. I am realizing the importance of cultural and aesthetic diversity. Why should music of various Asian traditions (and I acknowledge the difficulty of such labels) be any less valued than music of european traditions? Or for that matter, why should aesthetic education be deemed less valuable than scientific knowledge? This is not being anti-science, but the recognition that the task of meaning-making takes many forms, of which scientific knowledge is but one. I've only recognized the implications of Sir Ken Robinson's TED, and so the potential of those ideas for a more enriching experience for our lives remin unfulfilled. A Malay wedding is being held across the road in the void deck of another flat - a reflection of the intersections that exist in our society. These intersections need to be attended to as well, as we proceed towards an uncertain future.

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

Linguists in India

An endangered language is probably as important as an endangered species, though I suspect the conservation biologists to have issue with this...http://www.technologyreview.com/printer_friendly_article.aspx?id=26452&channel=computing&section=

Technology Review

artificial intelligence from NYT

New York Time's coverage of recent developments on AI seem to suggest that we could be at the base of a new dynamic of growth. 

This is IBM's supercomputer playing Jeopardy!

and something more recent - a computer learning language by itself

then.. an AI mimicking empathy and emotions...

and Jaron Lanier's take on this

I would classify AI under a category of "existential" issues since any development in this front would post existential issues to the question of being human. The other example of an existential issue would be genomics and synthetic biology, since that again, challenges our widely held notions of our biological make-up. And nanotech, in affecting our notions of physical reality which remains involate in a common-sense way.

Then again, AI could be a DUD field for the next 50 years, especially since the past 50 years also held promises of exponential development of AI that never came into fruition. I guess this could be opinion I might come to regret in the near future, but for now, the series of NYT does seem rather serious.

Tim Jackson

I read his book, and I'm even more impressed about this TED Talk. What he seems to be doing, is to lay the ideological foundations for a genuine post-recession world. How does this differs from Natural Capitalism? I think what makes his ideas stand out from the rest is that he has truly put the human project at the centre of his concepts which intersects with the environment and the rest of economy. This differs markedly from Lovins in Natural Capitalism where the environment-economic nexus is primary, where human capital is only one chapter towards the tail end of the book, almost like an afterthought. I will be watching his work more, I guess. 

Sunday, October 03, 2010

Reads!

As Singapore is one of the low-lying cities mentioned, this will certainly be interesting to note.http://www.deltacities.com/

On a related note, responding to climate change remains an issue, and the psychological aspects of it are only becoming understood in a comprehensive manner, in ways that could be relevant for policy makers, perhaps. 

Rituals and traditions

Facing death, I don't think any form of rationality can help to soothe things. Thoughts about god(s) and faith arise to help us with that unknown to make sense and meaning of them, to make that unmanageable more bearable. Managing that unknown then becomes the centerpiece of our lives, since we don't know when death might take us.

Friday, October 01, 2010

Civilian vs Citizen

Somehow the question of civilian vs citizen wafted into my head as I'm now thinking about obligations anyone has towards any social institution. 

And of course, this is related to a previous post on paternalistic view of persons under the charge of social institutions in Singapore.

I think the term active in active citizenry is by definition, or at least the ancient, classical Greek definition, superfluous. By definition, a citizen in ancient Greece ought to participate in political, democratic debates. Similarly, by definition a citizen ought to be contributing actively to the affairs of the local community or the nation as a whole. Governments then, from one definition, ought to be allowing these impulses of contribution - which in Singapore, they don't. Initiatives are deemed to be upsetting existing institutional orders, or subjected to tremendous bureaucratic review. This bureaucratic coddling seems paternalistic, and increases the transactional costs of wanting to do something meaningful for the local community.

I am also thinking of an "attention"-centred society. I'm not entirely sure how that works out, could be another victim of selection of ideas (in the sense of natural selection). A citizen needs to be educated on the ways to contribute. I can imagine some sort of grassroots leadership in local neighbourhoods. Politics is ultimately local - how to train local leaders assess the needs of citizens, and to think up ways to address those needs.

If followed through, a true citizenship education is one that involves hands-on work... That really is all there is to it. And the effort involved is tremendous - after all, this is about giving personal attention to the lives of people under the responsibility of the grassroots leader. In the process, one has to pay special attention to the ethical issues on going about the ways to do the right things rightly.

This is capacity-building on a nation-wide scale. As one can observe. And this about the allocation of funds, of manpower, and most importantly, a compassionate attention to the lives of ordinary people. 

Reads!

Hypnosis is not balderdash after all!

*cough cough* small developed country could become carbon neutral by 2050 (and nope, it's definitely not Singapore!

Wisdom of crowds, now measurable?

"Honey, where are we going for a holiday?", asked the mistress. 
"To space, darling." replied the billionaire.

Floods in Pakistan, additional reports - a reminder that technology is a privilege, not a given.

An Epiphany of sorts

Recent struggles in life have indicated to me this fact:

1. That Singapore and the various social institutions took on a paternalist view on the people under their charge. This means that NUS does not trust students to do things responsibly; and translated to as such to wider society - Singapore government and politics basically don't trust their citizens to act responsibly or intelligently.

2. The question to ask then is: why?
- We have no political education, or rather that in the education process, students (citizens-to-be) are not asked at all to discuss what it means to be a citizen.
- The political discussion that presents itself during adulthood becomes then the arguments on ad hominem and reasonable dialogue.

3. What then, is to be done?